“You like me, right now, you like me!” *

Well, some of you like me, and I thank you for it.

And because I’ve now passed 5000 visits, I’m really curious to find out where you come from as you can’t all be my mother logging in from different IP addresses.

So if you haven’t already, could you please show me you Like HH by visiting the Facebook page and doing the Like thang? I would be very grateful, in an integrated linked-in-social-media-networking kinda way, because then I’ll “get access to insights about my activity,” which sounds like fun. Even if they are just statistics. But you are more than just a statistic to me, really.

* And who uttered those heartfelt words from the title? Cinefiles will know:

Posted in Film and TV, Popular Culture, Social media | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The coathanger: looking forward, looking back

I had a lovely (re)discovery recently – a piece of writing I’d forgotten about which emerged as part of an enlightening package of family memorabilia my auntie and uncle have painstakingly prepared and labelled on DVD for the enjoyment of other family members.

On the DVD are old photographs from my Dutch side of the family, along with a Word document containing transcriptions or translations (or both) of oral and written family history from grandparents and great grandparents from the early 20th century. They’re quite a read.

Right at the end of the document, I was surprised to see my own contribution (I still don’t know where you found it, GJ), which was an entry submitted to ABC Radio National’s The Comfort Zone program in 2002. The nasally eloquent Alan Saunders had asked for listener contributions on the subject of ‘what’s the best gift you’ve ever received?’ Although I didn’t win the competition with my entry, it was given a ‘special mention’ on air, which was pretty exciting at the time.

Now, in the interest of not offending anyone who’s ever given me a present, let me just say that the timing of the competition was perfect, just after my son was born. Here’s why:

“Picture this,” my grandmother said to me earlier this year on one of our increasingly special visits, “a young girl of sixteen, walking along the beach on the island of Vlieland, part of Holland. It’s 1932 and she’s about to go to college, a big step for a young woman.

She sees a wooden coathanger on the sand and picks it up, noting the inscribed ‘N.Y.K. Line’ and immediately has fanciful notions of its owner. It must belong to one of the dashing officers from a passing ship, she thinks, looking out to the North Sea. He probably hangs his shiny uniform on special hangers just like this. It might even have been the captain’s!

And so with these romantic thoughts she pockets the hanger and decides it will be a special but practical keepsake for her college uniforms.”

With that, Oma hands me a coathanger from her wardrobe. The wood is smooth and worn with many hues, but the grain still shines thanks to staining and polishing over the years. The ‘N.Y.K. Line’ is carved in a gentle half circle following the yoke shaped wood, from which emerges the curved hanging wire which, amazingly, is still in shape and devoid of rust.

Below that inscription is another one, ‘R. Kapsenberg,’ my grandmother’s maiden name; and the number 37, her college number. I recognise the deliberate, neat lettering as hers and it blends comfortably with the corporate logo.

Having been to Holland with my husband for the first time three years ago, I have seen those North Sea beaches that stretch for miles under the grey-blue skies of Europe. It was easy for me to imagine my grandmother walking along those shores, young and full of promise, never dreaming that in fifteen years she would leave Holland with her husband and two young daughters bound for Indonesia, where a son was born, before arriving in the totally foreign environment of the Western Australian goldfields in 1950.

After fifty years she calls Australia home, but in 1932 her imagination was dominated by the landscape of her youth and the romantic sentiments of adolescence.

“Here,” she says, “you have it”, because she knows, without either of us saying anything, that I will treasure it as a memento of her youth and a reminder of my cultural history.

“What a coincidence about the 37,” I say, “because that’s how old I am now.”

It seems to have been the right time for me to receive it, because I then tell her I’m pregnant, and in September my grandmother’s first great-grandchild is born.  

So now the coathanger rests with a superior air on the nursery clothes rail alongside its smaller plastic, mass-produced relatives, waiting for its story to be passed along.

A few years after finding the coathanger, my grandmother graduated from college. On the DVD are two photos from her family graduation celebration, including this one where she is being congratulated by her mother. It’s the only photo I have ever seen of my grandmother as a young person looking relaxed and happy – isn’t it wonderful!  

[Kapsenberg house, Groningen, c1936]

Posted in Conversations, Family | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

A death in the family – part two: grief and its relative effects

In my last post I wrote about the death last month of my cousin James from cancer. He was 34 and had been married to the love of his life for nearly 13 years, and a father to a gorgeous four and half year old girl . His wife, daughter, parents and two sisters are bereft at his loss, and words can’t express how sorry I am that they have experienced, and continue to experience, this horrific family event.

But I am experiencing it too, and more so than I can explain, or feel entitled to. Is this what grief is?

There’s something raw inside that keeps weeping, and the tears have been flowing for months now and show no signs of stopping. And I’m not his wife. Or his mother. Or his sister.

I am not worthy.

I’m only his cousin. And – let’s face it – if you were to ask me what his favourite food or movie is, or his wedding anniversary, I wouldn’t have a clue. Before his cancer diagnosis I’d seen him maybe a handful of times as an adult since his wedding 12 years earlier. As mentioned in the earlier post, I was a teenager when he was born, and an adult far removed from family while he was growing up.

But we had become closer in recent years … and now we’ll never know what our familial friendship would have become. Is there a relative effect, where the further away you are from the gene pool, the less grief you’re supposed to feel? Is this what grief is?

Is the guilt I feel for decisions made, or not made, when young cousins weren’t important in my life adding to the sadness for what was and what now never will be? Is this what grief is?

Is it the overriding tragedy of the sorry story that leaves his grieving wife and daughter behind; so many people at the funeral united in their sorrow for them, for his family, for themselves in missing the opportunity to grow old together. That has to be part of it.

I don’t know the rules of grief, and I don’t want to know. I don’t want to read rational explanations of emotional processes right now.

I just know I loved him, and I’ll miss him.

And in his memory, I’m sharing Arvo Pärt’s Cantus in memoriam for Benjamin Britten, which I first heard on the soundtrack accompanying Tim Winton’s Dirt Music. In a bittersweet coincidence, not only does Winton incorporate this music to express one of his character’s struggle with terminal cancer, but Pärt wrote it in 1977, the year James was born.

It is as dramatic as it is simple, and incredibly moving.  I particularly like this pared back, intimate and intense performance. The video comments augment some of my own feelings, and I love the one that says “it also contains the mathematical beauty of a math equation,” which seems appropriate for James.


This is what grief is.

Posted in Family | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A death in the family – part one: two funerals and a cupboard

Twenty years ago last month my grandfather died, aged 78. Opa had been ill for some time, and his death was not unexpected. His was the first death in the family for me and I felt it deeply, having spent a large part of my early childhood in my grandparents’ home receiving the softer love and attention often given to the first grandchild.

At the time of his death I was living in Melbourne – in retrospect, quite miserably – and I travelled to Albany in regional WA for the funeral. I was 28 and had embraced Melbourne coolness and a fondness for black clothing, but the fickle nature of style over substance was no preparation for the death of a loved one. Worse still, I’d been in Albany only a few weeks earlier to ‘say goodbye’, thanks to the benefits of being in the travel industry. I remember other family members deliberately going to the beach so I could have some alone time with Opa, but it was awful. He didn’t want to talk, and I didn’t know what to say. And then the moment had passed, and weeks later there I was driving Oma to the cemetary for the funeral service.

Some time after the funeral, obviously once the raw emotions had eased, I remember Oma commenting with bittersweet humour how annoyed she was with Opa that he’d died 16 months short of their 50th wedding anniversary.  She’d really wanted to reach that milestone. Nine years earlier they’d celebrated their 40th anniversary with a lovely dinner attended by family and friends at the Fremantle Sailing Club. It was a very rare event for the two of them to be the centre of attention in such a social setting, but they genuinely seemed to enjoy themselves, as you can see from the toast in their honour:

Another gift to Oma and Opa for their 40th anniversary was a photo album of their family, including individual photos of their four children and respective families, and a group portrait:

I was 19 in this photo, the only adult grandchild and cousin by a long shot (with two more still to come), and about as removed from the realities of family life as any teenager could get. I was madly in love and centred on my own existence. That’s not to say I didn’t have a strong bond with all my aunties and uncles, who had been wonderful role models for me growing up as an only child. And, yes, I had also discovered that young cousins were in fact quite lovely, some of whom were young enough to be my own. I’d even babysat a few times, and visited newborns in hospitals, content to be able to give them back.

Back to 1992, and in the days following Opa’s funeral, or perhaps during a visit later that year once I’d moved back to Perth, I was with Oma and the topic of handing down certain family items came up, as she was beginning to label pieces of furniture and paintings and special pieces. I guess it must have been part of the grieving process and moving on from Opa’s death, and she was carrying out the task sporadically in her own very matter-of-fact and methodical way, as and when it seemed appropriate. I can’t remember how it happened exactly, but I think in a moment of what I thought was emotional maturity I took a deep breath and asked if I could have the cupboard she kept her odds and ends and bits and pieces in.

It was not a stylish, or classic, or beautifully crafted piece of furniture, but I loved the nooks and crannies it exposed when you opened the two doors, and the possibility of my own odds and ends perhaps one day filling the homemade drawers that Opa had added in the early years of their time in Australia. I must have hung about Oma’s knees as a young thing while she rummaged inside it to find whatever was needed to fix or make or sew, because it seemed an extension of her. I knew it would be years off, which has proved correct, but I was comforted when Oma agreed to my request, and marked the inside of the cupboard with my name.

Over the ensuing 20 years, Oma’s cupboard has moved with her from the family home to a smaller unit, then from Albany to Perth to share a unit with Mum, then another move to a house in Boyup Brook with Mum, and, most recently, back to Albany where Oma is now settled in a retirement home alongside Mum in an adjacent unit. This most recent move in 2011 necessitated the handover of the cupboard due to downsizing. And so it came that in September my husband and I did the trailer trip from Perth to Boyup Brook, collected the cupboard, and brought it home where it has sat in the garage waiting for the time and commitment needed to bring it from Oma’s world into mine.

That time arrived recently in the most unforeseen, unhappy and imperfect circumstances. That’s because last month our family experienced the first death since Opa’s 20 years ago. Not my grandmother, not an uncle or auntie or one of my parents, but one of the little smiling faces that I babysat from the photo above. James died from bowel cancer at 34, himself now a loving husband and father of a four-year-old girl, and had 11 months fighting a painful, heart-breaking battle against the disease that he and his wife knew was terminal from the day of his diagnosis but chose not to disclose to anyone.

When you look at a family portrait like the one above, it’s never the little ones that anyone imagines will die first. It has been a devastating time for James’ family, and the grief has spread to us all like ripples on a pond.

Last weekend, which fell between James’ death and his funeral, Oma’s cupboard called me  to make it ready in time for her three daughters’ arrival at our house, in advance of Tuesday’s funeral where they would stand united in love behind their grieving brother.

My husband and Brownie helped me to sand it back (Blondie was sick), and then I painted it before new handles were added to finish its new look. We also bought a new key to fit the original lock and external plate.

     

The outside needed a makeover, without doubt, but I deliberately kept the inside exactly as it was. I wiped down the painted surfaces and the old lino lining the drawers, and left the few remaining pictures and special things of Oma’s that she didn’t remove. I don’t know their history – perhaps one day soon I’ll ask her, or pull them down and see who sent them, or if there’s any writing, but that wasn’t important on the day.

It was such a perfect day for painting, warm and breezy, and during the repetitive strokes I thought a lot about this cupboard, how it came to me, and what it will be for me. I thought about the links these two fine Hos men have and will continue to have through this cupboard – that it came to me through the death of the first, and now sits in my office because of the death of the second. It’s not the way anyone would want to plan such a thing, but who can ever plan such things and know what, and when, is right.

James Cornelis Pieter Hos: 16.11.1977 – 22.01.2012

Jan Cornelis Pieter Hos: 30.10.1913 – 09.01.1992

Posted in Family | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

HH is being rested

While it’s not like me to liken this blog to the preparedness or otherwise of, say, an AFL footballer heading into finals season, nonetheless I’ve decided to give Hegemony Heights a rest for a while.

I have some busy months coming up, to the point that if I’m posting here it’ll mean I’m neglecting far more important things (probably including my children).

I keep thinking of Hegemony Heights as being a bit like Malcolm Turnbull: lovely to look at with something to say – and contribute, dammit – underneath all that other stuff, but not quite being able to ‘cut through’ the way he wanted. So I’m going to give HH a relevance check, a thematic review, and let it take a long hard look at itself. Perhaps Malcolm can do the same!

I’m well aware that a blog suffers from infrequent and inconsistent posts, and it’s for this very reason that it’s easier to completely stop at this stage. But when I come back, you’ll know about it!

Thanks to all those who have read along from time to time, and even come back occasionally.

JB

ps – okay, I’ll probably update Brownie/Blondie Talk and Bumper Edition every now and then because I can’t help myself, and they’re easy to do. Righto, then.

Posted in Blondie, Brownie, Bumper Edition, International Relations | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A curly one: Frieda, Our Nicole, Rebekah and me

When I was a young girl I was an avid reader of the wonderful comic strip Peanuts, and I remember the arrival of Frieda and her tendency to remind anyone who’d listen that she had “naturally curly hair.” At that time my hair was dead straight – or, to use my Oma’s expression, I had ‘nail curls’ – and it seemed to my girlish understanding of femininity that having naturally curly hair must be pretty special, even if it made you a bit annoying.

Then the hormones kicked in during puberty, and on that eventful day in 1978 when I went to the hairdresser and asked for a perm, she laughed and layered my hair instead. And I didn’t want it layered, dammit, I wanted a perm like the models in Cleo magazine. But layered it’s been ever since (apart from a few short-short years), releasing my inner bounce so much that even by the end of high school a friend was calling me ‘ovine’.

Fast forward 30 years or so and I have fully embraced my Frieda-ness and I know that my hair helps define me – more so, I suspect, than how the straight hair of a lot of my friends defines them. I can’t explain why this is, other than it is just so much more out there and in everyone’s face (if they’re up close) and certainly in mine. If I had a dollar – literally – for every time friends and perfect strangers have told me (and continue to tell me) “you’re so lucky to have those curls / you have such beautiful hair / your curls are just right, not like my waves/boring/straight/kinks/[insert horrid hair adjective here]” I would indeed be rich in hair products.

But not everyone wants curly hair in their face, or anyone else’s, which brings us to the hair-straightening trend of white western popular culture over the past decade or so (alongside the long-present hair straightening within African-American culture), which shows no signs of abating.

And just in case you think, at this stage, that I’m getting a bit too carried away with the whole curly subject, let’s take a look at Our Very Own Nicole Kidman, and remember what she used to put on show. The ‘nail-curled’ Ms Kidman was recently (re)interviewed on 60 Minutes by Karl Stefanovic and it’s Australian pop cultural cringe at its finest, including this exchange:

KARL STEFANOVIC: We’ve got some vision of you – the first interview you did with 60 Minutes when you were 21.

NICOLE KIDMAN: Oh, no. Really?

KARL STEFANOVIC: It’s very cool. It was like, “Wow! This hair!”

NICOLE KIDMAN: Yeah, I now blow-dry my hair and I’ve actually had the Brazilian Blowout. Have you heard of that, Karl?

KARL STEFANOVIC: Do I need to know about it?

NICOLE KIDMAN: It’s not… You mention Brazilian and guys are like, “What?” No, it’s the hair blowout thing. So I had that once but my whole life has been trying to get rid of curly hair.

KARL STEFANOVIC: Really?

NICOLE KIDMAN: Yeah, any curly-haired girl will tell you that and now I’m like, “Oh, I wish the curls would come back.” But they don’t come back in the same ringletty way. So, anyway, hair’s a whole other conversation.

Well, it’s this conversation because if you go to the Brazilian Blowout web site, there’s a page dedicated to Befores and Afters and the message appears to be “we can fix this problem [curly hair] and make you better [with straight hair].”

Which brings us to Rebekah Brooks. Now she has clearly not invested in a Brazilian Blowout – quite the opposite, I’d suggest. A recent Jezebel article (‘Everybody Watch Out For Rebekah Brooks’s Hair!‘) looked at the way that Brooks’s hair has been reported, and commented on the stereotypes of curly hair and the dangers of endowing a hair style with too much meaning.

But c’mon! This is where I’m going to draw a long bow as a curly-haired sister and say that hair is as deliberate and overt a statement of personality as you can get. And what clinches it is that she doesn’t emphasise her make-up or fashion choices (that I can see from my thorough research via Google images) so in fact it’s all about the hair. You don’t keep that amount of hard work on your head without wanting it that way.

And if by now you really think I’m off the rails, I dare you to read the Peanuts strips above again, and this time change the name Charlie Brown to Rupert Murdoch. Fun, huh. I liked this one too:


[Thanks to United Features Syndicate via the lovely Snoopy And the Gang! site]

Intersestingly, in the comments section below the Jezebel article, there is a discussion between UK and US contributors on the perceived professionalism of straight hair over curly hair, with some US women saying they’d been pressured professionally to straighten their hair.

So it’s tricky. There are issues of self-esteem, genetics, cost, pop culture, careers (for heaven’s sake) and anti-frizz at play. However, none of these things will, in the end, protect or excuse Rebekah Brooks from her actions.

And I have a confession to make. In recent years I’ve made a habit of getting my hair blow-dried straight when I leave the hair salon after *ahem* colour assistance. The first time I did this when Brownie was old enough to notice (about 3), I came home just as he was nodding off to sleep, and he took one look at this woman who used to be his mother and burst into tears. That demonstrated to me the power of straight v curly.

Finally, how do you know if you can proudly announce, Frieda-style, that you have real naturally curly hair? Well, you go to naturallycurly.com of course, and classify your curls. For the record, on a good day I reckon I’m a mix of both 3a and 3b. I’ll never have the choice of whether 2b or not 2b (okay, that was more than a bit annoying, sorry).

Posted in Current Affairs, Popular Culture | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

No use crying … ?

Well, I was made to eat humble pie (flavour of the week) yesterday when I read the outcome of the ACCC report into the ‘milk wars’ between supermarkets earlier this year. Regular readers may remember I got a bit annoyed at Coles when the $1 per litre was announced.

The Age reports that, according to the ACCC, there’s no evidence that Coles has acted in breach of competition rules or engaged in predatory pricing. Also, importantly:

“As to the relationship between dairy farmers and milk processors, it is the case that some processors pay some farmers a lower farm gate price for milk sold as supermarket house brand milk.

“However on the evidence we’ve gathered over the last six months it seems most milk processors pay the same farm gate price to dairy farmers irrespective of whether it is intended to be sold as branded or house brand milk,” Mr Samuel said.

I’ll be watching to see dairy farmers’ response to the report, but it all still seems a bit hard to swallow.

[From in pastel's photostream]

Posted in Current Affairs | Tagged | Leave a comment