Words and meaning, form and content

I’ve been sorting through the office, a much overdue task since the renovation / carpet / painting / new desks / renewed study habit, and found a copy of the June 2010 Monthly which I’d been keeping aside.  Why?  Because I remember being quite taken by this opening line from Juliana Engberg’s Artful Excess review:

The marketing material for the seventeenth Biennale of Sydney displays a lusty engagement with the semiotics of font.

When I first read that I remember thinking, “I wish I could write an opening line like that one day.” It sounds good when you read it out loud, it flows and is so damned descriptive!  Words and meaning.

And it’s not as if I’m a huge participant or observer of the art world. Because of where and how I live these days, I don’t get a chance to do Biennale stuff and discover people’s eclecticism and all that other arty stuff – I’m lucky if I make it into the WA Art Gallery for the school holiday Lego activities. But upon engaging with Engberg’s words, I just wanted to dive head first into the brochure and wallow; first, to explore the form, and then maybe even float about the content and dream a little.

Form and content. Words and meaning.  Learning these two bits of cultural theory were a great revelation for me. And that’s why I wish I could write an opening line like that one day.

[And now that I've been to the Biennale site, I see what she was getting at!]

Posted in Language, Popular Culture | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Fun with sugar

Well if that isn’t a blog post title reeking of Donna Hay, nothing is. Consider this my nod to food porn, flaccid though it may be.

On Tuesday afternoon the planets aligned for me and Brownie to finally put together the gingerbread house given to him at Christmas.  This is what we were aiming for:

Exhibit A:

As the resident engineer-in-training, he was in charge of ensuring that all the structural elements were intact and ready in order of assembly when the ‘glue’ – ie, melted sugar – was ready:

.

Exhibit B:

.

.

.

.

.All I had to do was melt the sugar. I’d forgotten how hot liquid sugar is, especially when you dip your finger in the spoon to have a quick lick (luckily it didn’t get to my mouth):

Exhibit C:

.

.

.

.

It’s actually quite difficult to apply melted sugar as a wall binder when it’s just at the toffee stage. Especially when the engineer is now frightened of the sugar and doesn’t want to hold the walls together, let alone organise the roof to have eaves, having seen his mother yelling and stomping with a burnt finger, and applying said sugar haphazardly with one hand. But we got there, kind of.  And fortunately my, “this looks about right” icing recipe worked well, and the engineer and I had a great system going when it came to applying the M&Ms on the roof, sort of:

Exhibit D:

.

Note the architecturally interesting roof line. Note the absence of chimneys, visible in Exhibits A and B (they succumbed to ‘taste testing’ prior to building). Note the carefully angled photo. That’s because the other side ended up like this:

Exhibit E:

.

.

Not quite a cake wreck, but something to be proud of nonetheless, don’t you think?

Posted in Brownie, Domestic Dross | Tagged | 1 Comment

New words*

* in the style of the Washington Post Style Invitational, where, in this case, one letter of a word is removed and replaced with another to create a new meaning:

Sacrilecious – the act of enjoying, against the will of its intent, the taste of any item offered in religious ritual; eg the Eucharist.

Ediot – someone you entrust with your writing to make comments, corrections and suggestions but end up realising they’re not as clever as they think they are.

Riputation – what big business, politicans and celebrities don’t want to lose in New Zealand (apologies :) ).

 

 

 

[Thanks Adios, Nirvana for the image.]

Posted in Language | Tagged , | 2 Comments

In praise of Ethan McCord

* Update 9 May *
Note to self: don’t publish blog posts late at night while still processing confronting information just consumed in front of large screen. It may give incorrect impression on ticker, resolve etc, and things will be different in the morning. Same goes for sending emails to careless tradesmen, irresponsible colleagues etc. Yes, the feelings will be the same (you will not turn into an automaton) but your response may be more appropriately communicated. Carry on.
= = = = =

I’m beginning to  think I don’t have the stomach, the ticker, the resolve to continue studying International Relations. I’ve just watched John Pilger’s documentary The War You Don’t See, and I wish I hadn’t seen part of it; the children, dead and dismembered, strewn across the rubble of destruction wreaked by distant, emotionally removed soldiers – the good guys of our Western narrative.

Remember the Wikileaks footage of the US Apache helicopter shooting at the group of civilians, including the Reuters cameraman (and, now I discover, two children)? This footage is discussed in the documentary, and this post is as a result of that footage.

In particular, I want to congratulate Ethan McCord.

He was one of the first US foot soldiers to arrive on the scene after the shooting, and I won’t go into detail here on what he saw, or what he did, other than he acted humanely – more humanely than his superiors wanted him to.

He has since left the army, and has spoken in various public arenas about the experience on the day of the shooting. Here he is addressing the United National Peace Conference in New York in July 2010.  The full 17-minute Wikileaks video of the Apache footage, shown to this crowd just before McCord made these remarks, can be found here – but a warning, it’s confronting, and you’ll have to sign in.

This link on The China Rose site has an interview which brings us more up to date with McCord’s activities. Here is the apology letter he refers to in this interview, which I think is magnificent.

So congratulations to Ethan McCord for not letting his military training get in the way of being a compassionate human being, first and foremost. I know the purists will argue, “he should have done his job, he could have let his team down, that’s what he signed up for, that’s what he’s paid for,” etc. But I don’t think too many purists are ever put in his position.

And this post – having taken an hour or so to write – has now re-inspired me, again, to keep watching and reading and learning about the geopolitical horrors occurring around the world. But what can I do with this knowledge?

Watching a doco like Pilger’s makes you feel so helpless, so completely impotent (such a good word to use in this world of men at war); that, as one person in li’l ol’ Western Australia, what difference can I make? And yet McCord is just one man; a man who, at one stage, was part of what Assange and others call the military-industrial complex and yet he has made a big difference in his individual way.

I’m just going to check the boys are asleep now.

In WWI, civilians accounted for 10% of deaths.
In WWII, civilian deaths had risen to 50% of all casualties.
During the Vietnam War, 70% of deaths were civilians.
Poor Iraq.  Nearly 90% of the deaths have been civilian men, woman and children – one million people. And that’s just Iraq.

Posted in Current Affairs, International Relations | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

When Harry Met Sally 2

If you haven’t already discovered Funny or Die, visit for a laugh when you need one. Just be warned, it’s very ‘adult humour’. And once you’ve watched a few ‘Between Two Ferns’, you’ll see why Zach Galifianakis is now popping up everywhere.

Here’s FoD’s latest, proving how ‘ageless’ Billy Crystal is, and ongoingly wonderful Helen Mirren is.

Posted in Popular Culture | Tagged | Leave a comment

Facebook: leaving v consuming v producing

A few weeks ago I followed a friend’s lead and decided to back off from Facebook for a while. My friend had eloquently explained on her blog the reasons for her decision, which included, among other things:

Since bushing the Book, my productivity has soared in the office and at home. I have had far more, what I like to call “voice-on-voice” conversations with gorgeous friends and perhaps most telling of all I have stopped thinking in status updates.

There’s been quite a trend of abandoning Facebook in recent months; just Google ‘leaving Facebook’ and see what comes up. People are leaving because of privacy concerns, useability for techno-types, time wasting, social issues around friends and content, but what my friend said about thinking in status updates really hit me.

In my case, as a part-time student with kids and a busy life anyway, there was an element of “if I’m on Facebook, I really should be doing something else, like writing an essay or cooking dinner,” plus there was the non-Facebook communication factor: I have a handful of good friends who aren’t on Facebook and I was ashamed to realise that on one occasion I’d become annoyed that they weren’t, because it meant I would have to ‘double-up’ to get in touch with them. Why couldn’t they just get on Facebook and be like everyone else, for heaven’s sake!

But still, it was the status update (my own) I realised I was most attached to. And I started to ask why.  Yes, I genuinly think it has been useful and entertaining to read other’s choice of words to keep me ‘in touch’ with their emotional, professional, political, economic or cultural state at that moment in time. Except for vaguely stated emotional attention-seeking behaviours which, fortunately, are few and far between because I have nice well-adjusted friends (mostly).  And we all love a link to a cute video of babies doing something adorable. Don’t we.

But still ….

After making my decision, I had a week or so before going on holidays. During that week I pretty much abstained. And it was okay. I started to think: what difference does it make to my FB user experience, and my friends’ user experience, to write about my reaction to Japan’s tsunami crisis, or what movie I just watched, or who I was going to have lunch with? What does it change in the overall balance of my social relationships, if I were to email the same information with more detail, or bump into someone and have a chat about it? Answer: absolutely nothing.  What need does it fufil in me, when providing a status update? That I matter? (If so, to whom?) That anyone cares? That I prove I’m fabulously witty, insightful, clever? That it’s important, heaven forbid. Nope. Not a bit. Big step.

Status updates are pointless, and yet oh-so-clever at the same time. Clever Mr Zuckerberg et al.

However, as if to prove the clever bit above, when I went on holiday, my ambivalence and questioning of FB was conveniently ditched and it was a godsend, and not just because I was at a Formula 1 race where there’s only so much time you can sit watching fast cars zoom past with engines so loud you have to wear ear protection, so that makes for pretty boring company if you’re not an F1 super-fan-geek. Which I’m not.

Anyway, it was great to take the odd mobile pic, upload it to FB, throw in a status update, and keep all those people on my carefully selected and maintained Friend list (note I didn’t say ‘all my friends’ because, alas, they’re really not) ‘updated’ on my holiday. Hell, I’m sure sure you all felt you were right there with me encouraging Webber along (in ear-plugged silence). Nice.

So on return from the holiday, I made another grand announcement:By this time, I had come to a fundamental realisation about my use of Facebook. I was only checking out of ‘the status update’ but still keeping my FB relationship open. Yes, I’d removed the shortcut from my browser, and I wasn’t contributing updates every day – but I’d still ‘drop in’ and catch up on the day’s activities, and occasionally post on other people’s comments.

I have predominantly become a FB consumer, not producer. Does it make a difference to my time?

Yes.

Will I blog more?

Yes.

Does that defeat the purpose?

You might have to read my Tweets to find out. At least they’ll only be 140 characters long so my irrationale will be more succinct.

And have I stopped thinking in status updates?

JB says yes.

Posted in Social media | Leave a comment

Haiku for International Women’s Day

Greer. Steinem. Summers.
Wolf. Zimmer Bradley. Dworkin.
They all have brought me

here. Hell, I even
remember Helen Reddy:
I am woman. (Roar!)

Posted in Language, Popular Culture | Tagged , | Leave a comment